Swarathma comprises of Vasu Dixit – lead vocalist and rhythm guitarist, Jishnu Dasgupta – bass guitarist and backing vocals, Pavan Kumar – Indian percussions and backing vocals, Sanjeev Nayak – lead violin and Varun – lead guitar.
Vasu is a bold, free spirit and the band’s inspired composer. He is the showman onstage that the crowd loves to cheer. Trained in Carnatic classical, his unique way of experimenting with tunes in Hindi, Kannada, English and Punjabi has been a driving force for his fellow band members. A filmmaker by profession, Vasu is also a theatre artiste.
Jishnu’s bio makes for an interesting read. On the one hand, it is the story of academic and corporate successes, with degrees from the National Institute of Technology and a top Business school thrown in, and on the other association with music at all levels, from the Rock Street Journal to composing cult hits like GMD and Sabka Katega with Bodhi Tree. When not playing music, Jishnu is a communications consultant.
Pavan’s fingers draw inspiration from the hummingbird’s wings, creating rhythm on surfaces as varied as the Kanjira, the Djembe and the Dholak. His passion for percussion found expression when Swarathma happened to him, while still a student of art and photography at Mysore.
Meet Sanjeev, arguably the ‘athma’ in Swarathma’s music. A techie by profession, Sanjeev learnt the basics of Carnatic violin at the age of 12. The strings on his violin allow him the freedom to explore new sounds and experiment with different techniques.
At 24, Varun is the youngest of the group. He dabbled in dance, painting and singing before settling on the guitar.
What is Swarathma about?
Jishnu: The name ‘Swarathma’ came from one of our founder band members and ex-bassist – Abhinanth Kumar. The idea is for our music to be the soul of the note, or perhaps notes from the soul. We would like to continue to make music that is honest and from the soul. The sound is derived from contemporary folk fused with Carnatic, rock and jazz
How did it all happen?
Vasu: When I first met Abhinanth Kumar, I immediately hit it off with him – sharing my compositions and at the same time learning while making songs with him. I realised that I would enjoy playing and making music with other like-minded people, so that I could expand my creative space by exploring more than what I could alone. There is a special joy that I always experience (mostly on stage) while playing with my band. The fun is when we come together and ‘make’ music right there at that given moment.
Haven’t you all come from different backgrounds? Does that affect or play any role in the music you create?
Jishnu: Yes, musically we have very diverse backgrounds. In fact we cannot stand each other’s iPods when we’re travelling. Varun listens to a lot of instrumental rock, while Pavan is a pure classical music lover. Similarly, the others too have different tastes. But the beauty comes from the fact that we respect each other’s backgrounds. When you bring those influences that you’ve heard as a child into the jam room, you bring a musical energy that can be harnessed to create something unique.
Take us through some of your biggest albums and songs.
Swarathma was the debut album released in Jan 2009. It was judged Album of the Year 2009 at the JD Indian Rock Awards. The song Pyaasi, with Shubha Mudgal was made into a music video which has over 100,000 views on YouTube and featured on music channels like MTV. The Soundpad compilation from the British Council featured two of Swarathma’s songs. The TV Series Dewarists featured one of Swarathma’s songs called Duur Kinara. The second album Topiwalleh was released in 2012 to rave reviews.
What inspires you all?
Inspiration comes from life and the world around us. The key is to be open to it and to be affected by it. Once you let the world affect you instead of saying ‘I don’t care’, you set yourself up to express those emotions in some way. We do it through music. If not the world around us, we’re inspired by other great musicians we listen to or watch.
What is happening in the coming days?
We have been working on new songs for the third album as well as for a couple of causes. We support the Oxfam Trailwalker, a 100km-48 hour team race that is aimed at raising funds. We also composed a song for the BMW Guggenheim Lab aimed at responsible and sustainable development of cities. We are working on remixes of our current songs with DJs who are reinterpreting the songs in a new way!
Which artistes/bands inspire you the most?
There have been several bands that have blazed a trail, and shown us that it is possible. Indian Ocean, to begin with: they believed in their dream when nobody else did. Then there is Avial, Motherjane and Pentagram. Inspiration is all around, and it’s free. You just have to be open to it.
Do you collaborate with other artistes and bands? Tell us about some of them.We firmly believe in the power of collaborations in music. We’ve jammed and collaborated with several artists. We’ve created Pyaasi with Shubha Mudgal and it is the most noteworthy of our collaborations. We also co-wrote the Dewarists song “Duur Kinara” with her. We’ve jammed with metal bands, DJs, thavil players, saxophonists and others. The main thing is to make a personal connection with music.
Do you think bands get enough attention in India?
Bands have started to get more attention than before – that is mainly because bands have started taking themselves more seriously. It is only now that bands are beginning to get noticed, partly because they are creating great music and partly because audiences have become more open. Either way, it is a great time to be a band in India!
The Lives of Others (Des Leben der Anderen) Year: 2006 Language: German Director: Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck Cast: Ulrich Mühe, Sebastian Koch, Martina Gedeck
This quiet thriller set against the backdrop of the East Germany-West Germany conflict might leave you surprised and extremely curious. Most of our knowledge of the politics of Germany would be from our school history textbooks that spoke in sprinkles about the Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall. None of this, probably, ties up in people’s heads with the innate richness that detail gives you. ‘The Lives of Others’ might not offer a peephole into everything about the history of World War II and the post-WW II era but it is guaranteed to make you extremely curious about the much-feared Stasi.
The Secret Police of the GDR (German Democratic Republic) or East Germany, the Stasi were feared, reviled and respected. Gerd Wiesler (Mühe) is a Stasi Operative who is entrusted with the task of spying on playwright, Georg Dreyman (Koch) and his partner, the actress Christa-Marie Sieland (Gedeck). The famous couple’s apartment is completely bugged and Weisler and an associate are on the task round-clock – they hear every conversation, every step and can listen in on every amorous sigh. The complete and utter invasion of privacy is but a regular side-dish of Stasi operations. Artists and others who they perceive to be against the State are regularly blacklisted. Dreyman’s friend, Jerska, a writer is one such. East Germany is no place for dissent, much less rebellion. But why was Dreyman under surveillance? Wiesler, at first, believes it to be necessary to stem possible opposition from an outspoken artist. But he later realises what the real reason is – to keep an eye on Christa-Marie on whom the Minister of Culture has his eyes set. Disgusted by this, we see how he slowly and surreptitiously begins to feel for Dreyman and Christa-Marie and subverts his duties to help them out. He does not report that Dreyman is writing an article berating the State for the high rate of suicides in East Germany. Or that it is being smuggled across the border to be published in a widely read magazine in West Germany. Christa-Marie’s dependence on pills and her intense association with the Minister adds a fine twist in this tale.
Where does this sordid relationship between the Stasi and Dreyman and Christa-Marie end up? Why did the Stasi do what they did? Some of these questions will be answered by watching the movie. The movie ends on a hopeful note – the news that the Wall has fallen! ‘The Lives of Others’ won the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film in 2006.
Verdict: I thoroughly enjoyed this movie with its secret police, illicit relationships and mind-games. Please watch it! Rating: Hot: The thrill of watching the inner workings of the Stasi and its sheer ruthlessness Not: Personally, being fascinated by movies of subterfuge and rebellion, I felt like the movie could’ve gone a little beyond and shown us what other terrible things the Stasi were responsible for during their heyday.
Chinese Eye (Sepet) Year: 2004 Language: Malay, English, Mandarin, Cantonese, Hokkien Director: Yasmin Ahmad Cast: Ng Choo Seong, Sharifah Amani
As usual, every month I think of the countries, the movies of which I have not yet explored. Sometimes it’s staring you in the face and you just don’t realise it. And it is thus that I realised I had never watched a Malay movie! Having visited Malaysia twice, it was strange that I had never thought of looking for Malay movies to review. ‘Sepet’ or ‘Chinese eye’ is a sweet romance with sufficient dollops of drama to keep you curious throughout the movie. Ah Loong (Seong) is a young Chinese boy who sells pirated VCDs in the market. One day, Orked (Amani), a young, pretty Malay girl comes to buy movies and he is smitten. He tells her his name is Jason, and slips in his phone number on a little bit of paper in the cover with the movies. Orked calls him and a sweet, young romance ensues.
Before I watched the movie, I was expecting just that – a sweet, young romantic comedy. Well, remember the oodles of drama I spoke of earlier? That changed things a bit. Jason and Orked are from two completely different cultures, those that rarely cross paths, much less, romance or marry. And this was something completely new for me. That the Chinese and Malay don’t really mix in Malaysia. Their romance raises quite a few eyebrows, both from friends and family and we realise how deep the prejudices run. They are unmindful of the comments though, and their romance blossoms.
Meanwhile, our young hero, Ah Loong is caught up in a sordid mix of money, sex and gang politics in his lower-middle class locality. We realise that he has an affair with the local goon, Jimmy’s sister. The timelines are a bit blurry and we are not sure if he is cheating on Orked or if the affair happened before he met her. All the same, non-disclosure comes to bite him – Jimmy is on the lookout for him and why? Well, Ah Loong gets his sister pregnant. The movie takes a dramatic turn for the worse. Ah Loong and Orked separate and Orked gets a scholarship to study in England, and she is devastated with the news. Ah Loong tries to win back her trust with long letters of his undying love. Does the magic return or does the movie end in tragedy? Watch the movie to know what becomes of the young Chinese-Malay couple.
Verdict: Interesting watch, especially the way English is spoken by the Malay! I love it lah! Rating: Hot: Facets of Malay society and culture that you may never have thought to explore Not: I felt it was over-dramatized a bit, but that’s something we Indians are used to!
The Celebration (Festen) Year: 1998 Language: Danish Director: Thomas Vinteberg Cast: Ulrich Thomsen, Henning Moritzen, Thomas Bo Larsen
The first movie of the Dogme 95 movement, ‘The Celebration’ is Dogme I. Vinterberg, the director of this movie is also one of the founders of the movement. The Dogme collective espouses simple filmmaking – the use of handheld cameras, no props, no sound apart from those produced naturally and so on and so forth. The Dogme rules are fascinating in their simplicity. The movie-watching experience is not ‘created’ for the viewer; instead we are drawn inexplicably to the reality of the situations portrayed. And I have never felt it more than with a movie like The Celebration. This is the story of a family that gathers for the 60th birthday celebrations of the patriarch, Helge (Moritzen) and the tumultuous occurrences at the celebration. The party takes place at their family-run hotel, old and beautiful set against a stark, wan Scandinavian landscape. Helge and his wife, Else have four children – Helene, Michael, Christian and Linda. Solid and pensive, we wonder what secrets Christian (Thomsen) is hiding. Michael (Bo Larsen) is a terrible boor who we know can be up to no good, even in the first few scenes of the movie, when he forces his wife and kids out of the car and makes them walk to the hotel in the hot sun. We can’t quite place Helene: she is emotional and obviously extremely close to Linda, Christian’s twin. We know that Linda recently died, and it is only a little later we realise that she committed suicide in the hotel.
At the celebratory lunch, Christian makes a toast to his father – and reveals something terrible. He and Linda were sexually abused by their father as children, routinely taken into the study to play out his sick fantasies. As a viewer, I am not sure which was more heart-wrenching, pummeling me in the stomach – the callous non-reaction of the whole extended family or the revelation itself. Everyone at the table pretended not to hear it and continued to talk after a momentary silence. Christian leaves the table only to return with more revelations. What follows is even more sickening. We realise that the mother knew throughout and still shields Helge. Helene tries to hush him up and divert attention. Worst of all, his younger brother, Michael and two of the hotel staff drag Christian out, beat him up and tie him to a tree in the woods! All of this is done in a bid to silence him and protect the grand old man. But mystery shrouds and we are curious of the contents of a particular letter, the letter Linda wrote before she committed suicide. What does this letter say and how does it turn the celebration on its head? Please do watch this movie. You will be moved, you will be enraged and isn’t that also what movies are supposed to do?
Verdict: A wonderful movie that will touch you in its simplicity. Rating: Hot: Real, completely natural performances and situations that speak volumes of the Dogme 95 movement of filmmaking. Not: Being as we are used to traditional filmmaking techniques, the naturalistic Dogme style may not be for everyone.
Where do we go now? Year: 2011 Language: Lebanese Arabic Director: Nadine Labaki
I thought it might be fitting to review two movies that speak of the battles and triumphs women face, especially in the light of the nationwide anger and angst after the Delhi gang-rape. ‘Where do we go now’ is a stirring, inspiring movie set in an unnamed village in Lebanon. Muslims and Christians live in happiness and mutual respect and tolerance, in spite of the strife between the two communities in the world outside this little village. The community is tight-knit and our heart warms at the camaraderie among the inhabitants. What is especially heart-warming is the mutual support and dependence of the women in the village.
Roukoz and Nassim are the go-to boys in the village. They take requests and orders from the people and then go into the city to procure these items. Amal (Labaki) looks after the local café and is a Christian. Rabih, the local painter and odd-jobs man is in love with her and it seems as though there is a constant back and forth of suggestive glances and blushing undertones between the two. In scenes that remind one of Bollywood movies, the two often imagine themselves singing songs of love to each other! More importantly, Rabih is a Muslim.
The woman are constantly thinking of ways to keep the men from becoming communally charged and fighting each other, as tension between the communities is very high outside the village. The heads of the Church and the Mosque too, work together to maintain peace in the village. And that is what is so interesting and exciting about this movie – the potential of numbers, and of a strong leadership. When the Cross in the Church is broken when Roukoz tries to fix it, the Priest tells everyone that the wind broke it. When a goat is thrown in the mosque and one of the Muslim men picks a fight with the Christian, the Imam urges people not to blame the Christians for what happened. When the only television in the village broadcasts news about fights in other villages and parts of the country, the women break the TV so that the men have no reason to pick fights with each other.
But the village does spiral out of control when Nassim is killed in firing outside the village. Small fights become bigger and the women are at their wit’s end. And what do they do? They invite a group of Russian dancers to distract the men, and then persuade the Priest and the Imam to fix a meeting to discuss the communal tension. At this meeting they mix Hashish in the food served and while the men are heavy and happy with all the drugged food, they take their weapons and bury them! Meanwhile, the Christian women wear the Hijab and the Muslim women discard it! Why, you ask? What can I say – this movie is fascinating!
Verdict: The movie portrays so beautifully the power of a few people to change the order of things – do watch it! Rating: Hot: The women are superb, their dialogues and little fights will keep you entertained throughout. Not: Makes you wonder if this can actually happen – friendship and the desire for peace transcending religious affiliations.
And Your Mother Too (Y Tu Mama Tambien) Year: 2001 Language: Spanish Director: Alfonso Cuaron Cast: Gael Garcia Bernal, Diego Luna, Maribel Verdu
This movie is what is known as a coming-of-age movie. Well, for the theme of the movie as well as for the viewer! This is a movie about two teenage boys and their skirmishes with their sexuality. Tenoch (Luna) and Julio (Gael Garcia) are best friends who spend their days together, drinking and whiling away their time, wondering about what to study in University. Tenoch comes from a wealthy family, the son of a politician and the movie is set against the backdrop of some troublesome times in Mexican politics. Julio is from a much less affluent family but these differences seem to be bridged by their mutual love of, and obsession with girls, women, sex, alcohol and drugs (coming-of-age indeed).
The movie opens with a sex scene, which makes us realise why it had trouble with rating certificates in many countries. The boys’ girlfriends, Cecie and Ana are off on a trip to Italy for the summer and they bid them their not-so tearful goodbyes. They claim to be committed to their girlfriends but their desires and ambitious plans on who to sleep with for the summer make us rethink that…as does the whole movie! They attend a political luncheon organised by Tenoch’s dad and here they meet Luisa, Tenoch’s cousin Jano’s wife. They are immediately taken by her and through various bumbling, embarrassing attempts at flirting with her, invite her on a road trip to a fictional beach in rural Mexico!
Meanwhile, Luisa (Verdu) who is in her late twenties is going through a personal crisis – her husband has confessed to cheating on her. She is devastated and calls up Tenoch to take them up on their offer. And therein starts of the road trip of their lives – one that is about nothing and everything, and one that changes their lives forever. I call this movie coming-of-age for the viewer, especially for the Indian viewer simply because it is unabashed about its explorations of sex, sexuality, desire and lust. Very little is left to the imagination and there is very little left to shock the viewer. This movie is as raw and as real as it gets. As you might have expected – Luisa sleeps with both boys, albeit in sordid, awkward encounters. The boys discuss their various sexual experiences with her and she speaks wistfully of her first boyfriend and of her husband. But one drunken night, everything changes for them. The boys confess that they have each slept with the other’s girlfriends! And Luisa, Tenoch and Julio have a threesome. I think I have said enough. Watch this movie to know the meaning behind the title.
Verdict: Unabashed and real. Considered controversial for the themes it explores. Rating: Hot: Makes you think about those things that we shy away from talking about Not: Could be too raw and bare-naked for some
A Khaled Hosseini novel takes you on a journey that cuts across time, space and borders. Whether it was through the eyes of two little boys in Kite Runner, or through the eyes of two fierce and strong women in A Thousand Splendid Suns, Hosseini has a craftsmanship in his writing that can evoke a lump in the throat with as much ease as he can leave a wistful smile on your face.
His recent magnum, And the Mountains Echoed, is no different from his previous works in that sense. The same ominous sense of foreboding is present right through this novel too as it takes you to a different Afghanistan, one that has contours of a time even before the disastrous hand of war destroyed the fabric of its existence. He takes you along all the way from Afghanistan to France, Greece and San Francisco. Opening with the rendition of a bedtime story by a father to his two children, the book begins with a tale that pretty much sets the stage for the events that will unfold in the coming pages. Starting out in an Afghan village in the 1950s, the story begins with a young boy, Abdullah, and his sister Pari. The two of them are soul siblings in the truest sense of the term; the bond between them is so deep, poignant and palpably strong. Just when you think that the bond surpasses the supremacy of the filial tie, and that it will remain unshakeable, something happens that shakes up their lives and throws the familiar out of the window. As Hosseini puts it, sometimes a finger must be cut to save the hand. Travelling across the world – from Afghanistan to San Francisco, from Tinos in Greece to Paris, you get vague glimpses of life in India and a touch-and-go with a refugee-camp in Pakistan.
While at it, reading some parts of the book might feel like being in the centre of an anthology of short stories. Hang in there though, because they tie into the main narrative in a very neat rendition. What sets Hosseini apart is that every little character – whether obscure or prominent – is given a complete story. You don’t find yourself wondering what a character wound up doing in the book – each person is a thread in an intricately woven fabric. Hosseini shows you the larger reality through smaller realities. He tells you that life goes on everywhere, you simply have to dust yourself and move on. One thing that is certain with Khaled Hosseini’s writing is that you are sure to reach for the box of tissues: whether in absolute inexplicable grief along with the characters, or the feeling of helplessness at the larger ethos that is reality in Afghanistan.
Seventeen and Done (You bet!) by Vibha Batra chronicles the trials and tribulations of its seventeen-year old protagonist Rinki Tripathi. Her teenage life is strewn with the usual challenges – exams, parents, relatives and friends to name a few, but Vibha handles them in a refreshing manner. The book is not preachy or moralistic, but comes across as a witty take on a teenager’s life and all the sticky situations that come along with it.
Vibha’s first book Sweet Sixteen (Yeah, right!) published by Penguin was very well-received and led to talks of a sequel. But that is something she had already planned for. The first book starts with Rinki moving cities from Kolkata to Chennai, just like Vibha did at a similar age but this is where the similarity ends. The second book follows Rinki’s life as she tries to form her own identity amidst parental and peer pressure, earning the wrath of the no-nonsense Princy, while balancing the Board year and grappling with matters of the heart.
The book touches upon challenging teen issues like late night curfews, the frustrating deadline at pubs, the one upmanship at social networking sites and job pressure in a light-hearted manner. Seventeen… also drives home the message that not all 18-year olds want to be doctors or engineers and it is best to pursue your passion. The protagonist wants to become a fashion stylist and writes her own blog dishing out fashion gyan. The characters are interesting and real, be it Mausiji, her parents or her friends. While Rinki is fashionable and opinionated, Google is gregarious, fun loving, resourceful and believes in working smart. Adit, on the other hand, is Rinki’s voice of reason – he is a straight arrow, who believes in working hard. The usually studious Robin is in a long-distance relationship with Sriram (from book one!), so she is a little distracted. Sudha is a sweet girl, and a devoted follower of both Rinki and Robin.
Written in a breathless, rollercoaster style echoing the thought process of young Rinki, Seventeen is a fun ride you wish you could go on, again and again. Young adults (at whom the book is targeted) will easily identify with the characters and will be sure to enjoy the book, peppered as it is with Facebook status updates, BBM messages, blogs and pop culture references. For the older reader, the book will make you want to go back to your school days- the best days of your life when you had zero responsibilities and maximum fun. Read on a quiet afternoon and relive the days of fun, friendship and freedom.
(Seventeen and Done is part of Inked, Penguin’s new imprint for young adults. To connect with Rinki and learn more about the book, visit www.facebook.com/seventeenanddone)
Intense. Impatient. Irascible. Immediate. Intimate. Impassioned. But there’s one thing you can never do, to him. Ignore. Pavithra Srinivasan in conversation with the acclaimed Gautam Vasudev Menon
RITZ Magazine March 2010 Issue
The man really needs no introduction: he’s been touted as the successor to Mani Ratnam, the man who brought passionate romances back in vogue on screen; who brought urban locales, men, women, and their problems into sharp focus; who made it possible for emotions to be right out there; unapologetic, unashamed, and unafraid to be bared. To wear your heart on your sleeve, while still being a macho man who could beat bullies. And best of all – box-office success, even if it was a little sporadic, at times.
Gautam Vasudev Menon is a rolling ball of energy, usually – but these days, perhaps, he’s not really keen on baring his soul to the general public, or the media. Certainly, he sounds impatient when I ask him for an interview. “What do I need to talk about?” he asks, equal parts of impatience and caution. “I’ve said everything that needs to be said.”
But patience, and his own need to share his experiences eventually wins out, and what follows is an explosive conversation on his movies, music, fans, heroines and best of all – himself. Over to the creative spitfire.
What’s your state of mind right now? What project are you working on?
I’m good. I’m doing a trilingual, Neethaane En Ponvasantham.
Care to tell us more about the film? And why is it a trilingual?
There’s no particular reason why – I just think it’s the kind of story that needs to be told, that can be told in three languages. Also, I wanted to work with three actors (laughs). The whole process seems to be interesting. That’s why I’m doing it. I can’t reveal too much about it, but it’s a love story. It’s about two people, and about how they meet up in various moments in life. And finally, do they get to be with each other or not? That’s how it rolls.
You’ve worked with Harris Jeyaraj and A R Rahman in the past. Any reason why you chose music director Ilaiyaraja for your latest venture?
(Pause) Is there any reason why anyone wouldn’t choose to work with him? I mean, come on, I’ve wanted to work with him; I’ve grown up listening to his music, that’s the only reason. I’ve always admired him. I’m a big fan of his work. Many moments in my life have been defined by his music. Just like I wanted to work with Kamal sir at one point, I wanted to work with Raja sir as well.
What happened with Ek Deewana Tha, the Hindi version of Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa? The film failed at all levels. What went wrong?
I don’t know – I don’t think people got the film. I think Prateik (Babbar) was a rank newcomer and people didn’t come to the theaters to see the film…
There was some criticism that the dialogues didn’t work in Hindi the way they did in Tamil. That they were literally translated and made no impact.
There were all sorts of criticism with the whole film – not just the dialogues. People didn’t like the story; they didn’t like the whole simple idea of two people being that way with each other – I think Bombay and these Hindi critics, they’re generally used to certain films; their whole life is based on the films that don’t subscribe to this kind of reality. They didn’t see the film. And about ten critics killed the film and prevented people from coming to the theatre. We didn’t have a Ranbir or a Shahid – just Prateik, who I didn’t think could carry the weight of the film on his shoulders. Other than AR Rahman, we didn’t have anyone to support the film as such, in terms of big names. I think people didn’t even come to the theatre to see the film; they just picked up the talk.
You’ve worked in three movie industries: Tamil, Telugu and Hindi. Do you think there’s a great deal of difference between them?
No, I think it’s just a perception, that’s all. The working style and everything is just the same. It’s just that in Hindi they’re very star-driven. I mean, here, I can make the same Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa with rank newcomers – and I would have gotten away with it. But there, you need stars to get across the film to the audience.
What about Nadunisi Naigal? People say it’s your worst film ever. Do you think you could have done something different?
No, I’m actually happy with the way the film turned out. It was experimental. It was supposed to be bizarre and again, it’s a question of why did I make this film? The audience here has this perception that I make a certain kind of film and they couldn’t handle it. It worked against it and prevented most people from coming to the theatre. Which is why we slashed the budget – we made the film in Rs 1 crore 50 lakhs. We took a big opening during the first 3 days actually, which made the money for us, with the satellite rights and everything. It was a smart film, in that sense – it was made at a very low cost; we knew it wouldn’t work beyond a certain point, and a certain section of the audience. It was just me trying to make the kind of films I’ve always wanted to make and not stick to familiar subjects. I’ve got absolutely no regrets about any film I’ve made. We actually showed it to a lot of people in Bombay, and they liked the film. I’m sure 10 years from now people will actually say, it’s a part of a journey in film-making.
What has changed since Minnale, your first film? It’s been a long and eventful career.
I’m still learning the trade, learning the way the industry works, the way critics respond, and stuff like that. Nothing has changed, absolutely. With every film I learn more, and look forward to making my next film.
But you have a reputation for being very forthright.
That’s just me. Not just with films, but work, and that’s how I’ve been in life also. I think my films are like that as well.
So who’s the best heroine you’ve worked with, so far?
I still haven’t found her. I mean yeah, I’ve liked everybody’s work, but I’m still looking for that perfect leading lady. I’ve liked working with Jyothika and Trisha, definitely. Maybe if I get a chance to work with Kate Winslet, I’ll tell you.
So far, you’ve shuttled between romance and action, mostly. Any reason why you haven’t tried anything else, yet?
What other genre could I try? I guess I’m not too bad at comedy – Minnale and Neethaane En Ponvasantham do have their share of humour. I think all my films are laced with some humour – even Vettaiyaadu Vilaiyaadu had Kamal sir mouthing some funny lines. Other than that, I tried the psycho-thriller line with both Nadunisi Naigal and Vettaiyaadu Vilaiyaadu.
Why do some of your films take a long time to make, while others are done quickly?
I think the answer lies in your question. Some films take a long time to make, because they take a long time. See, making a film depends on the actors, the situations – like, Vaaranam Aayiram did take a long time because we had Suriya playing two characters; we wanted him to lose weight for one and put on weight for the other. We gave him the time, you know, to change. In fact, he played characters from 16 to 60 and we gave him three months to actually look different, between each of the characters. But Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa was done in 60–75 days. Most of my films have been shot over 70 days. When you work with people like Simbu, you know, he needs a little time to complete things. You can’t get him every day and get him to do work. Also, when you want music from someone like AR Rahman, you get the songs spread over eight months. You need to wait for the music to come.
Speaking of Vaaranam Aayiram – wasn’t the film an ode to your father?
Yes.
How influenced were you, by him, in your work?
Not just with my films, but generally in life. I was really inspired by him. He was a dear friend, and we had a very easy relationship. We always used to go to each other when things didn’t work out. I was inspired by him with everything: life, love, cricket…
What about your film with Ilaiya Thalapathi Vijay?
It’s starting in June. It’s one of our biggest films, and I’m really looking forward to it.
Looking at the title, Yohan: Adhyayam Ondru (Yohan: Episode One) – is it a part a series?
Yes, the film will have sequels. We’re going to set up a character that people will want to come back and watch, like a James Bond kind of thing.
Fair enough – but why Yohan?
Yohan’s a very popular Christian name. It’s another form of John, actually. In Christian circles, people will definitely know what it means. We wanted something unique.
There’s been a lot of talk that the film’s posters were inspired by a French film.
See, if you look at what people have done on the Net – they’ve actually taken our posters, and put it on shots of Will Smith and other French films. We haven’t done that. The official posters we came out with, the ones that appeared in the newspapers and magazine, are all original. The ones that appeared on the Net are what fans have pulled out and used on other images. They’re not what we’ve done. It’s not a remake or an inspired film. It’s original in every way. (Pause – and now he’s quite angry) See, I don’t want to answer these questions. People write all sorts of things. There’s this online community that’s very jobless. They sit in closed rooms and vent their feelings. You can’t respond to all these people because there’s a big hatred out there, towards certain people. Like this whole controversy about Ilaiyaraja and AR Rahman, because I’m doing a film with Raja sir. I mean, seriously? Who are you to sit in a room and talk about legends like Ilaiyaraja and AR Rahman? To compare them is really unfair. After a time, I decided that there wasn’t any point in reading these and responding to them. Because these are frustrated, jobless people. And they do all sorts of stuff, sitting in their dark rooms, in front of a computer. It really doesn’t matter. This is a very small community, which reaches out to a small section of people. Internet penetration itself is very low in India. And even among those, there are very few people who actually browse and comment. I mean, how jobless would you have to be to actually comment on a trailer? How many times have you or I commented on a trailer we’ve seen? If we see something online, we like it and move on. We don’t sit and comment on it. It’s just not done.
Isn’t there some talk about a TV series with R Parthiban?
Yes – we’re starting it in a month’s time. We’re doing a series of episodes based on a central character who happens to be a cop. It is set in Chennai and is about crime in the city and how cops handle it. It’s also an emotional story about a cop who is a widower and with a daughter. It’s going to be very interesting. And it’s going to have music by AR Rahman, incidentally.
That’s a first, isn’t it? Bringing AR Rahman to the small-screen? How difficult was it to manage it?
Oh, he was perfectly okay with it. Didn’t take any convincing at all, because he said, ‘We really should improve the quality of programmes on TV. Television is so bad; we must do something to better it’. It will be like, one hour episodes, hopefully Monday to Friday.
What’s your journey been like, as a producer?
It’s a journey that’s just begun, actually. We know we’ll come around and do much better films. Hopefully, we’ll make more money and put that back in the films. We have been meeting a lot of people. Now that you’ve made films and a name for yourself, people want to make films for you. All the big directors want to make films for themselves and we want to work with smaller, new directors. First, we need to establish a banner – and that’s not going to be easy. I mean, the first three films didn’t actually make much money for us. But we’re trying. We will. We’re actually coming out with two films this year, apart from our own Yohan. There will be two or three more films next year – I’ve actually asked a couple of big directors to do something for us. (Pause) It’s been ten years in the industry and it’s high time we gave something back to it…
Norwegian journalist Åsne Seierstad is perhaps the only one who got to cover the Afghan war after 9/11, and the Iraq-US war in 2003. To put out information as the war happens in the form of news is one thing: but to chronicle one’s story and rendition of their time in the country is a whole different endeavour. Attempting to do the latter, Seierstad’s book is a narration of her time in Afghanistan with a local family, and of the view of the world from their side of the lens.
With the Taliban falling in November 2001, Seierstad managed to find a rather educated and sympathetic Afghan bookseller in the heart of Kabul. Their lives are a sharp contrast: whether in the most basic difference of ethnicity, or in their way of leading life and treating others in their family. Written in simple language and in a narrative style that is very casual, the book is a beautiful reflection that drives home a simple truth: whether you are Norwegian or Afghan, a relief worker or a reporter, a bookseller or a bomb-squad expert, at the end of the day, all you want is some food, shelter and clothing, and a way to stay safe.
Seierstad begins from the same spot that most international reporters started from. Their trip down the Hindu Kush, right into the interiors of the Intercontinental Hotel, where there is a well-stocked bookstore that has some of the most coveted titles of all time. The owner is intelligent, to say the least, and an exception to the norm of grossly prevalent illiteracy. He leaves you with haunting words of truth: ‘First, the Communists burnt my books, then the Mujahideen looted and pillaged, finally the Taliban burnt them all over again.’
The narrative is a fictionalized account, and does not degenerate into a boring and linear narrative of her adventures as a traveller. She meets the bookseller and moves in with him, and watches his family as they go about their normal lives. But she is nowhere in the book – for it is written as one would write a piece of fiction.
Seierstad’s leading protagonist is the quintessential patriarch, for all the exposure he boasts of otherwise. His family is also an extension of his business, as each one stands sullenly in their allotted roles, unflinching in their “duties” to each other. Seierstad makes an explosive display of the family dynamics: the bookseller’s sister is nearly his slave, his son is a breadwinner of sorts as he is made to sell sweets at the hotel rather than study at school, his first wife is in a difficult spot as he chooses a sixteen-year-old to be his second wife and his elder son speaks candidly about sexual slavery and how poverty stricken women are made to suffer sexual abuse in the face of utter poverty. There are tales of harsh reality: stories of sexual abuse, discrimination of women and honour killings where brothers are sent to kill a girl who follows her heart and gives into an affair that her family frowns on.
After meeting resounding success for the book in its Norwegian version, the book made waves when its English version hit the markets. One among myriads of books that the rich landscape of war-stricken Afghanistan has inspired, The Bookseller of Kabul holds its own ground without much difficulty. The quality that swings everything in its favour is the candour with which the story is told. That Seierstad adores the family she stayed with is obvious, as she accepts them un-judgmentally. But her heart goes out for the women in the family, as they are jostled about and treated like dust. It doesn’t matter how old or young the man is: just being male is qualification enough to dominate over a woman.
To Seierstad, the book is about just ‘one middle-class family, if one can use that expression in Afghanistan’. And, of course that is what is so compulsive, repulsive and frightening. If this is what life is like in the family of Afghanistan’s answer to Tim Waterstone, there is clearly no hope for Afghanistan.
Indian writers and thrillers are rather far apart, and therefore one can be forgiven for approaching this book with some scepticism, since it has been billed a thriller. A former office of the Sikh Light Infantry, NDA alumnus Mukul Deva digs from within his experience in the armed forces to come up with a book titled RIP, or Resurgent Indian Patriots.
The central character of the book is the protagonist Colonel Krishna Athavale. The Colonel and his team of Special Forces Officers – known as the K-Team, since their names all begin with the letter K – are a set of vigilantes calling themselves RIP. The RIP wants to protect the country against rampant corruption prevalent in the system. To this end, they are willing to do anything, including kill politicians, judges and government officials who are perpetrators of scams, having siphoned off many crores of rupees. There is also the copybook antagonist in the form of Raghav Bhagat, who is also a former armed forces operative, mired in scandal himself and who has been hired by corrupt politicians to hunt out the RIP.
The beginning of the book has many characters drawn from real life incidents and scams, with just their names altered. There are also mentions of real scams like the Bofors and the 2G spectrum scam. It is not very difficult to draw a parallel to the real life people and one wishes the author had used his imagination to come up with some different situations instead of pulling them out of newspaper reports. But, barring that small flaw, the book is rather racy and keeps the reader quite on the edge.
The assassinations are carried out by the RIP with detailed planning, given that they are all trained Special Forces men, to arm twist the establishment and get the Lokpal bill passed in the parliament. The scared, scam-tainted Home Minister and his cronies engage their own special operative – former SPG Raghav Bhagat – who is a conscience-less mercenary and has his own axe to grind with Athavale. The State Police Force is also on their heels, trying to nose out the assassins. It turns out to be quite a cat and mouse chase, even as the RIP continue to evade everybody and continue on their killing spree, hitting quite high up in the political hierarchy.
Interspersed in the plot is a love story between Athavale and a television news anchor Reena Bhagat, the separated wife of antagonist Raghav, a rather sweet and sentimental addition to the story. Between the action and the love story, the readers are drawn quite well into the book. The story is also well thought out, considering the author’s knowledge of the inner workings of the security forces and the SPG that provides protection to politicians, the details are spelt out meticulously.
Given that corruption is a household issue in the country right now, this plot will strike a chord with most readers. One may not agree with the way justice is dispensed by the RIP, but it will still find you rooting for them, against the state police force and the establishment. Overall, a rather simple but well-paced read that will have you decide that Indian writers are not bad with thrillers after all!
If Harry Potter, the Lord of the Rings and the Chronicles of Narnia was the literary diet you grew up on,Amish Tripathi and Rajiv Menon could well be the best prescriptions for your dose of fantasy fiction, while connecting you with your heritage.
Thundergod –The Ascendance of Indra tells the story of Indra. Indra is regarded as the God among Gods – for being the only one of them all that is closest to being a man, for he is a god that makes mistakes. With flaws aplenty – arrogance, ego, anger and insecurity – Indra is central to the plot. A very beautifully woven storyline and a rich fabric of Indian mythology come together in a mellifluous melange of literary grandeur.
Thundergod takes us through the war between the Devas and the Asuras, with Indra’s character forming a very significant part. The tagline of the story hauntingly reads: ‘One day a prince from one of the four great tribes will unite the sons of Aditi and he will sow the seeds of an empire that will rule the world.’ Indra’s character is a common thread that runs through different sub-plots and stories, fusing them in what forms the grand big picture. Some of the book’s best moments and descriptive prose are of the war that took place at the Gates of Susa, the deluge of waters that destroyed the very edifice of the Harappan civilization and the fantastic stories of Mitra. Rajiv Menon has done immense justice to Indra’s character, portraying him in a very relate-able fashion, in shades of humanity. The story also carries within it a very poignant rendition of relationships: especially that of Indra’s close ties with Soma.
However, what pins you down about the book is not the narrative, but the way in which Indra is presented. That is the crowning glory of the literary achievement that the book is. That Indra is the subject is in itself a matter worth appreciating – as the core focus of most Indian fantasy fiction has more to do with Vishnu or Shiva and their myriad avatars.
If one had to point out the downside, it would be the over imperfection of the Gods. While the genre of imperfect lords is well received, the flaws begin to rear its head when you find that the imperfections are not handled or narrated in the right way. One such example is the sexualisation without sensualisation of the story. The scenes seem to lack flavour, and are largely rendered with a strange impassiveness. One other mild drawback is the overt attention that seems to be attached to Indra. He may be the central character, but that doesn’t allow license to overshadow the other characters in the book whatsoever.
Nevertheless, Thundergod is a book worth reading and re-reading, as it breaks new ground in the rendition of fantasy/mythology.
Imagine a community ravaged by conflict. What would the people be thinking of? Survival, that’s a given. Means to find the bare necessities, of course. Reading and learning Charles Dickens?
That’s a first.
Mister Pip, a beautiful tale by Commonwealth Prize Winner Lloyd Jones, tells the world of a story where reading Dickens represents salvation for a community torn by conflict. Set in a village on the Papua New Guinea island of Bougainville during a brutal civil war in the 1990s, the story is rendered from the eyes of Matilda, the 13-year-old narrator. The story begins with a blockade that has just begun. As helicopters circle the skies, the schools are empty and teachers have fled for their lives.
The entire island has only one white man, with a home in the jungle and an abiding love for Dickens. This kind man, Mr. Watts, is a firm believer in the fact that knowledge sets minds free. He assumes responsibilities of teaching the children of the village. With dreams of making the classroom “a place of light”, he takes the children through Great Expectations where they discover something just as vital as bare subsistence, “a bigger piece of the world” that they can enter at will.
In the beginning, there is a wonderful exposition on the escapist joys of reading. The sheer foreign element of Dickens’s world, its rimy mornings and blacksmith’s forges hold the class’ attention. Young Matilda falls in love with the orphan Pip, even going on to building him a beachfront shrine. When the war draws closer, the subversion of the stories seems to shine brighter. Mister Pip is mistakenly assumed by “redskin” soldiers to be a rebel fighter that they cannot seem to find. At that moment, the boundary between fiction and reality dissolves.
Great Expectations changes young Matilda. In a country bereft of any knowledge-inculcation, she finds herself instilled with a moral code. Their book is destroyed, midway. But Mr Watts jumps in, filling in, recounting Pip’s tale in instalments to avert disaster. The yarn he spins combines elements from many lives: those of his own, Pip’s and the islanders’.
The story is a magnificent rendition, carving a microcosm of post-colonial literature, putting together narratives that speak of races and fables. In an island split by war, Charles Dickens unites.
An Iraqi woman and a British reporter exchange emails every day. What’s special about that, you ask. One’s a brave, hard-smoking lecturer of English. The other is a mother of three and a news reporter. Hard to guess which? May Witwit lives in Baghdad, Iraq, braving bullets and bombs just so she can go get her hair cut and blow dried, lecturing at a university. Bee Rowlatt is a mother of three, and a feisty lady trooping through the trials and tribulations of motherhood. The paths of the two women cross each other in a way that redefines their lives.
A simple email brings the two of them together, and takes them on a journey that shows them a friendship like nothing before. Transcending the differences of culture, religion and age, Talking About Jane Austen in Baghdad is the story of two women who share laughter and tears, swapping their confidences, dreams and fears. In the backdrop of war-stricken Iraq and an urban British setting, the two women come together to hatch an ingenious plan to help May escape the bombings of Baghdad.
Between bloodbaths and baking cakes, the two women send a volley of emails back and forth, talking about war, about teaching English and nitpicking husbands. May needs to escape a difficult future in Iraq. Bee wants to help her, but the lynchpin is money. In a revolutionary turn of sorts, the two women decide to take the plunge and plan to get May the money she needs: by publishing a book. The book they published is the very one that’s being reviewed here: comprising a chronicled rendition of all their emails. Their emails touch upon everything from hairdressers and Jane Austen to the Sunni-Shia conflict and the corruption in Iraq; from baking cakes for school sales and summer vacations, to democracy and daughters.
The book is simple, yet hard-hitting. With a clean insight into the different worlds that run in parallel, the book shows that humanity thrives across cultures, and that sisterhood is a bond that can be forged through any medium. Although the emails work well at the beginning, gradually the pace slows. It is an insightful journey for anyone that is interested in the challenges one faces while living in a war zone in the Middle East, in stark contrast to a Western Society habituated to modern-day democracy. If you’re looking for a racy, fast-paced book, this is not the best choice: the story degenerates into a crib-fest in parts, and also projects a superfluous proclivity on the part of the West in understanding the difficulties of a war zone.
“Buying is a profound pleasure”, said Simone de Beauvoir, while Nora Huime says, “Buying art is like falling in love”. To many collectors, buying, collecting, acquiring and the pursuit of the object become an intense passion. “Collecting at its best is very far from mere acquisitiveness; it may become one of the most humanistic of occupations, seeking to illustrate by the assembling of significant reliques, the march of the human spirit in its quest for beauty… “(Arthur Davison Ficke)
Many important collections find their way to museums. The old idea of the cabinet of curiosity originated when travelers to the Orient went back to Europe with curiosities that intrigued rich patrons and thus was born a museum. This need to do something with their objects developed further into an idea with a subject and hence the many museums we have today are of different disciplines. Today’s art collectors face similar quandaries and many new private museums will appear in India in the years to come to be final custodians of these pieces of history. These repositories are a result of passionate collectors who focus entirely with their heart and have an intellectual relationship with what they collect. They often live with objects that they love, getting intense pleasure from their presence. These maybe inanimate objects but the memory, history and narrative of the object sparks a fire that ignites this passion and hence the feverish accumulation.
In Chennai, VAK Ranga Rao is known for his collection of records, while the Roja Muthiah library is a result of a fantastic collection of literature. C Ramakrishna, a lawyer has started an arboretum, that is a collection of trees and Lily Vijayaraghavan has focused her decorative arts collection on Shringar. A local newspaper has been focusing periodically on quirky interesting collectors with varied themes ranging from pens to cameras to matchbox labels and so on. The common factor amongst all of them is their intense passion, love and involvement in building and nurturing their collections. These collections vary in depths and yet are chronicles of a time.
On the other hand there are collectors especially of contemporary art, who collect as an investment. They focus only on artworks that bring them a return on investment, while they hold it. Their aim is to make a profit while reselling the work. For investor collectors, their research will involve authenticity, provenance, condition and the history and geography of that particular work as all these points become relevant in a resale. They too live with their art, though larger collections find their way to storages. The need for investor collectors to circulate, update and continue to build their collections allows them to release some of their art works to the market and this then, becomes the secondary market.
Paul Getty the famous collector once said, “I buy when other people are selling”. The collector attempts always to acquire the best, and his knowledge of what is best is always widening. His is the task of judging between degrees of perfection. The collector is not looking for a decorative item, but a good investment. There is some aspect of the work itself that has allowed the price of the work to be determined. The history of the work is also about the story – the story behind how someone found it and who the artist was and what he did with his life and why he caught the fancy of ” a ” collector or a group of collectors and why they purchased it.. Often while focusing on a particular artist, collectors know that earlier works are hard to come by and scoring the secondary market allows for this search to be quite meaningful. The secondary market historically depends on rarity and a lack of availability to create a demand. An interesting aspect of this is that a “strong” secondary market trade allows collectors to buy “as well as” sell.
In India, most collectors of art have been wealthy patrons who bought initially to adorn their spaces and eventually turned to support the artists and their movement. The earliest known collectors of contemporary art were mostly around Bombay. Naval Vakil, Bill Choudhary and JRD Tata, were some of the earliest contemporary art collectors. Jungoo Nicholson, another passionate collector acquired a substantial part of his legendary collection from Bill Choudhary in lieu of a debt. The legendary TIFR and Taj Hotel collection was a result of the patronage of the Tatas. The Birlas in Eastern India, initially collected traditional art and moved to contemporary art much later. One of the most significant new media collections in India is that of Devi Foundations. (Lekha Poddar, one of Devi’s main forces is a Birla daughter). These collectors were followed by many others and now collecting art has become such a status symbol that it has helped many attain a status that they would not been able to, but for their collections.
One of the most important aspects for investor collectors is valuation and this is provided for by several galleries, websites and auction houses. While galleries help in building and nurturing an artist, acting like a bridge between the artist and the collector, the auction businesses are involved purely in the trade.
Building a collection is an important activity. It is important to be a significant collector and focus one’s collection, to find a direction in the vast sea of objects and art works. Be it a relationship, or a subject of interest, one needs a hook, as a link, to steer one through on the journey of becoming and staying a collector while building an important adjunct to cultural history. Art and culture are great facets of history and very soon collectors with relevant focuses will find their place in the trajectory of culture. Collection may be a selfish passion when viewed at its acquisitive culture. However its element of documentation of a time, is a facet that is highly undervalued.
To collectors, be it passion driven, or investment driven, the visibility and pride in their collection is of utmost importance. Like the proud mother of a newborn baby, each collector holds out his newest acquisition and each investor lauds the price he got on a resale. Collecting is a bug – once it gets you, it stays. The excitement, the intensity, the disappointments, the sharing- showing off is all part of the game. The joys know no bounds and sorrows are few, while the legacy and chronicle a collector creates is immeasurable to cultural history.
Today, art has evolved from being skill-based to intellect-based. It is riveted to the story one tells. Art has always been a creative way of communicating and today using many media, art is used to explore contemporary issues, political view points and news, in addition to personal dialogues. Artists have begun to mix different disciplines to make their point. Art today speaks volumes; whatever it is, makes a point.
In order to make the viewer see the point, artists use a variety of methods. They use their own personal language combining it with symbols and signs along with “a” story line. Unless the narrative is strong and the ideas are combined well, the artwork rarely speaks to the viewer. It has now become very important to make a point of what one is saying in the narrative of the visual arts. Take for example some of the works in the recent Kochi Biennale, that was focused somewhat on the lost city of Muziris, which was once a trading port. Many artists chose to confront issues of loss, decay, death, memory and history in different ways.
Subodh Gupta, one of India’s few global stars, has been preoccupied with migration and the transition from one world to another. In this curated exhibition he took a large gigantic boat and filled it with an entire household of things, from clothes, to utensils, to furniture, to a bicycle etc. and suspended it at a 45-degree angle, making a point about the deluge of Muziris and equating it to the biblical theme. It was the instability that he addressed and if one knew of his focus on the migration, it was very easy to see his storyline as it fitted very aptly in this biennale. At another time one would have to read his defense of the work to understand that he spoke of middle class aspirations and one’s transition from one level to another, borrowing from his own experience.
Vivan Sundaram, on the other hand created a large sculptural installation of a city in a small format to evoke the old city that was submerged and filled it with water to shoot a five channel video that was projected on the floor covering a large shed which was about 200 feet long and 30 to 40 feet wide. The drama of the size of the projection brought the experiential layer to the viewer who walked into a dark space to encounter the video which immediately took them into the mind-space of the deluge.
The other artist whose contemporary narratives speak volumes is Amar Kanwar who uses film, objects and writing and combines everything into a vey provocative and sensitive installation. He is a documentary filmmaker who selects sharp points of view and creates the most sensitive and poignant portrayals of the issue. He excels in the art of storytelling with his visuals.
[wzslider autoplay=”true” interval=”5000″]
Not all artists use the environment or political issues, some artists use single images and allow you to imagine what they want to convey leading you with the mood as does Dayanita Singh, with her photographs. Be it a room with the empty chair or the portrait of a family, the narrative comes through in her use of space and light. In the case of the photograph of the room with the empty chair, she actually makes you feel the presence of the person and their life from the selection of everything she chooses to shoot for her frame and the quality of light that she uses.
Looking at yet another artist, the young and talented N Ramachandran from Chennai, he uses objects and images that he finds and combines them together as an installation of ideas, places and things that recall the journey he has taken. He makes the narration of the urban graffiti into a documentation of a time and ideology that he wants to connect with and at the same time touches a chord to take the viewer along on this journey too.
So today the narrative one tells in addition to how they tell it is the success of an artist. Merely putting together images and portraying skilful handling of the medium is not sufficient. It is about the dialogue and the ability to engage with one’s mind that points to the success of an artist. The relevance and context that the artist draws the viewer to, marks the success of the artistic dialogue. Often these works are found in private collections and curated shows, while few make it to permanent public spaces.
This is now the era, where the role of art “is for” the world.
For collectors, patrons and artists alike, it is now not about owning and hoarding art but about everyone enjoying it and allowing art to make a difference in the point of view and carrying a message.